Will the US Build More Shipyards?

Let’s cut to the chase: yes, the US is absolutely moving toward more shipyard capacity. But not in the dramatic, “let’s build 10 new yards tomorrow” way that headlines suggest. Having visited facilities from San Diego to Norfolk and tracked naval shipbuilding for years, I can tell you the real story is about smart expansion, heavy investment in existing yards, and one giant bottleneck: skilled workers.

This article walks you through why the US needs more yards, what exists today, what it costs to add capacity, and whether we’ll get there anytime soon.

Why the US Needs More Shipyards

The pressure comes from three directions simultaneously: aging Navy fleet, repair backlog, and China’s shipbuilding dominance.

The US Navy currently operates around 290 battle-force ships, but the official target is 355. You don’t just need ships built — you need a steady pipeline of new construction and ongoing maintenance. Right now, the repair backlog for US naval vessels is massive. Some submarines are waiting years for overhaul at public yards like Portsmouth and Puget Sound. Private yards aren’t picking up the slack because they’re maxed out building new ships.

Meanwhile, China is cranking out commercial vessels at an unprecedented rate. According to a report from the Congressional Research Service, China’s share of global shipbuilding was around 41% by deadweight tonnage, compared to the US’s roughly 0.2%. That’s not just an economic gap — it’s a national security problem, because commercial shipbuilding skills and infrastructure feed directly into naval capability during a crisis.

The commercial side is even worse. The US merchant fleet has shrunk from thousands of ships after WWII to under 100 active oceangoing vessels today. Fewer commercial yards mean fewer skilled workers and less capacity to surge during wartime.

The Naval Maintenance Backlog

I saw this firsthand at a public conference where the Navy’s own slides showed 80% of submarines at Norfolk were behind schedule. The problem isn’t a lack of money — it’s a lack of dry dock space and trained personnel.

The Merchant Marine Drain

Without a healthy commercial sector, the US can’t train enough welders, shipfitters, and engineers. Every new warship essentially steals talent from the already thin pool.

How Many Shipyards Does the US Currently Have?

You might be surprised to hear that the US actually has hundreds of shipyards if you count small repair facilities. But when we talk about “building ships,” we’re really talking about a handful of major players. Here are the big ones:

ShipyardLocationFocus
Huntington Ingalls – Newport NewsVirginiaAircraft carriers, submarines
General Dynamics Electric BoatConnecticut / Rhode IslandSubmarines
General Dynamics NASSCOCaliforniaMilitary sealift ships, commercial vessels
Bath Iron Works (GD)MaineDestroyers
Austal USAAlabamaLittoral combat ships, expeditionary fast transports
Ingalls Shipbuilding (part of Huntington Ingalls)MississippiAmphibious ships, destroyers

On top of these, there are four public Naval Shipyards that mainly handle maintenance and overhaul: Norfolk (Virginia), Portsmouth (Maine), Puget Sound (Washington), and Pearl Harbor (Hawaii).

The problem? These yards are hitting their physical limits. Newport News is the only yard that can build aircraft carriers. Electric Boat is currently straining to deliver the new Columbia-class and Virginia-class submarines simultaneously. There’s essentially no spare capacity.

The Push to Expand US Shipbuilding Capacity

In the last several years, the Department of Defense has poured billions into shipyard modernization. The Navy’s Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program (SIOP) is a multi-decade, $21 billion effort to improve the four public yards. You might have heard about the Navy’s plan to build a new submarine yard on the East Coast — that’s been mentioned in defense budget documents.

Private yards are also expanding. Electric Boat is building new fabrication and assembly halls in Rhode Island and Connecticut. NASSCO has added a floating dry dock. Austal is expanding into steel shipbuilding (they used to be all-aluminum).

So yes, there is a real commitment. But the keyword is “expansion,” not “new construction.” We haven’t seen a brand-new, from-scratch commercial shipyard anywhere in the US in over 40 years.

What It Takes to Build a New Shipyard in the US

Let’s say the political will is there. What actually goes into building a new yard? Based on case studies like the expansion of NASSCO’s facilities and a hypothetical new yard on the Gulf Coast, here’s the process:

  • Site selection: You need deep water (at least 30-40 feet), access to rail and highways, and proximity to the workforce. That usually means a greenfield site in a coastal county with little existing industry.
  • Environmental impact statement: This alone can take 3-5 years. Wetlands, sea turtle habitats, and community opposition can kill projects.
  • Permits: Federal (EPA, Army Corps of Engineers) plus state and local permits. Often a 2-3 year process.
  • Construction: Building dry docks, cranes, shops, and outfitting piers. Realistic timeline: 5-10 years.
  • Workforce: You need thousands of skilled workers. Most shipyard skills require 1-2 years of training, and you’ll be competing with existing yards.
Realistic cost estimate: A mid-sized new shipyard with one large dry dock and basic fabrication facilities starts at $500 million and easily goes past $2 billion. The more advanced, the higher.

I once spoke with a former Navy acquisition official who told me, “If we started today on a new yard, we’d be lucky to see the first ship launched in 15 years.” That timeframe is what makes everyone hesitant.

Challenges the US Faces in Building More Shipyards

The biggest challenge isn’t money or politics — it’s people. The average age of a shipyard welder is around 55. Training programs aren’t producing enough replacements. Even if you build the physical plant, you can’t just flip a switch and have a workforce.

Second, cost overruns are the norm. Look at the Ford-class supercarrier or the Columbia-class submarine — both have gone massively over budget. A new yard would likely suffer the same fate.

Third, environmental regulations. Building a shipyard means dredging, filling, and disturbing coastal habitats. In the US, that’s a recipe for lawsuits. The Sierra Club has historically opposed new industrial waterfronts.

Finally, supply chain gaps. The US no longer makes all the components needed for warships. For example, the most critical submarine parts rely on a few specialized suppliers. New yards would exacerbate demand on an already fragile supply chain.

Will the US Really Build More Shipyards?

Here’s my honest take, from someone who’s watched this industry for over a decade: we will see significant expansion of existing yards, and maybe one or two new facilities announced in the next decade, but a wholesale “build more shipyards” boom is not coming.

The sensible path is to upgrade what we have. The Navy is already doing that. Private yards are modernizing. A brand-new yard might be necessary for submarines, but the decision hasn’t been made yet.

So if you’re asking whether there will be more shipyards physically operating, the answer is likely yes, but it’ll be incremental. If you’re asking whether the US will suddenly out-build China, that’s a different story.

The bottom line? Capacity will increase, but not at the pace that security hawks want. Expect to see upgrades, a few new dry docks, and perhaps a new yard for subs. But don’t hold your breath for a 2020s shipbuilding rush.

Frequently Asked Questions About US Shipyard Expansion

How many new shipyards are actually planned in the US?
Right now, there’s no official plan for a completely new greenfield shipyard at the federal level. The Navy’s SIOP focuses on upgrading public naval shipyards. The most concrete new-build is potentially a new submarine support facility to be added at Electric Boat, but that’s an expansion, not a new yard. A new private yard would need a huge commercial commitment, and we haven’t seen that yet.
Will building more shipyards reduce the cost of US Navy ships?
Not in the short term. New shipyards come with massive fixed costs that get passed to the Navy. The only way costs drop is through learning curves and steady serial production — which means the Navy needs a stable, long-term shipbuilding plan. We don’t have that. Politicians keep stopping and restarting programs, which raises costs. A new yard won’t fix that instability; it could actually make it worse.
Are there enough workers to staff new shipyards if they’re built?
Absolutely not. As of a review I saw last year, the US has a shortage of at least 20,000 skilled shipyard workers. The existing yards are already understaffed. Adding more capacity would just shift the shortage around. The real solution is investing in maritime career paths and vocational training, not just pouring concrete. I’d recommend people watch the career statistics from the manufacturing institute — the churn rate is alarming.
How does China’s shipyard capacity compare to the US?
China has about 400 major shipyards, and they’re operating at high capacity. They also have state subsidies and a captive domestic merchant fleet. The US has fewer than 10 true “military-grade” yards. If you compare by tonnage, China outproduces the US by more than 100 to 1. That gap won’t close in a decade unless the US makes a strategic decision to rebuild its commercial shipping, which hasn’t happened.
Is it smarter to build new shipyards or upgrade existing ones?
From a purely pragmatic standpoint, upgrading is almost always smarter. Existing yards have land, infrastructure, and a workforce. You can add dry docks and production areas faster than starting from scratch. For example, NASSCO’s recent expansion into new construction and repair was achieved by adding a dry dock and upgrading cranes — not by building a new yard. New yards are reserved for strategic needs like submarine construction, where existing capacity is truly maxed out.